Keeps this page in sync as the body changes. Pause it any time for a quieter view.
Path /ideas/api-error-handling
Last refresh never
How real it is
Not proven yet
Best time to work on this
Keep watching
Probably wait until the idea has clearer proof or a stronger upside.
Value still available
10 CC
How sure we are
40%
Same idea, different emphasis — not a rewrite of facts, but a bridge across perspectives.
Loading translation…
Save what this idea has delivered so far, how much it has cost, and how proven it feels right now.
Tip: use the same money assumptions each time so changes stay easy to compare.
Create a work card from this idea without leaving the page. This is a good place to capture the next small step.
Start with the big idea, then make it easier to act on. This view helps you name the direction, keep the scope small, break the work into smaller parts, and say how you will know it worked.
This creates plan cards only. You can review them first, then start work from the plan you want to use.
Direction
Clarify the first real-world outcome Api Error Handling should create and the person it helps first.
Scope
Keep the first version tight: one walkable flow, one visible result, and only the minimum support needed. From spec 009-api-error-handling
Smaller parts
Split the idea into promise, flow, and proof so each plan stays small enough to build and check.
Proof of success
A human can understand the value, walk the flow, and answer this open question next: How can we improve this idea, show whether it is working yet, and make that proof clearer over time?
Plans you place here carry the name you choose.
You can shape the preview below now. To place a plan, first be welcomed: choose a name. You will return here, and the plans will carry your name.
Lock the first audience and promise for Api Error Handling so the first version says something concrete.
Define who this helps first, what tension it resolves, and what the first visible result should be. From spec 009-api-error-handling
How you will know it worked: A new user can tell who this is for, why it matters, and where to start without extra explanation.
Turn Api Error Handling into one walkable flow instead of a loose collection of internal actions.
Map the creation, update, review, and follow-up loop in plain language. Use this open question as a design constraint: How can we improve this idea, show whether it is working yet, and make that proof clearer over time?
How you will know it worked: Someone can complete the core journey locally without needing hidden IDs, inside language, or hard-to-find navigation.
Make progress for Api Error Handling credible by showing what changed, what is blocked, and what should happen next.
Define the status signals, proof markers, human review points, and follow-up rules that keep the first version trustworthy.
How you will know it worked: The experience makes value movement, blockers, and next actions visible without extra technical interpretation.
Enter your contributor name to stake CC on this idea.
How can we improve this idea, show whether it is working yet, and make that proof clearer over time?
No answer yet.
CC staked on this idea and what it produced.
No CC staked on this idea yet.
Work cards: 0 created